<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matt Goldspink &#187; divorce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mattgoldspink.co.uk/tag/divorce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mattgoldspink.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>McDonalds and Disney file for divorce</title>
		<link>http://www.mattgoldspink.co.uk/2006/05/09/mcdonalds-and-disney-file-for-divorce/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mcdonalds-and-disney-file-for-divorce</link>
		<comments>http://www.mattgoldspink.co.uk/2006/05/09/mcdonalds-and-disney-file-for-divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 11:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcdonalds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mattgoldspink.co.uk/2006/05/09/mcdonalds-and-disney-file-for-divorce/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or at least thats the way BBC News made it out to be. Listen to some of these statements: &#8220;In separate statements, both of the US giants insisted that the separation was ending amicably for business reasons.&#8220; &#8220;&#8220;To set the &#8230; <a href="http://www.mattgoldspink.co.uk/2006/05/09/mcdonalds-and-disney-file-for-divorce/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or at least thats the way <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4752885.stm">BBC News</a> made it out to be. Listen to some of these statements:<br />
<img id="image320" src="http://www.mattgoldspink.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/Ronald_McDonald.jpg" alt="Ronald McDonald" class="left"/><img id="image321" src="http://www.mattgoldspink.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/05/125px-Mickey-06.gif" alt="Mickey Mouse" class="right"/></p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;<em>In separate statements, both of the US giants insisted that the separation was ending amicably for business reasons.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>&#8220;<em>&#8220;To set the record straight, we have had a very positive relationship with McDonald&#8217;s for the last 10 years,&#8221; said Disney in a statement.</em>&#8220;</li>
<li>&#8220;<em>The burger giant said the story was &#8220;based on Hollywood hearsay&#8221; and &#8220;a misrepresentation of the truth&#8221;.</em>&#8220;</li>
</ul>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve heard variations of those sentences in relation to various Hollywood divorces, like Jessica Simpson and her unfamous husband, Nick Someone-or-other or Matt Le Blanc and his unfamous hot wife (is unfamous a word?). Maybe it&#8217;s just me, having read one to many issues of Heat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mattgoldspink.co.uk/2006/05/09/mcdonalds-and-disney-file-for-divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

